Note: If the answer to these is no, you might want to check the mini-modules Beginning Your Research and Picking the Right Databases for additional help.
There are five basic areas of consideration for evaluating the quality of resources and they are, at least to some extent, dependent on the goals of your research. Evaluating print materials and electronic materials have many similarities. The differences will be noted between the two.

On this title page, the authors list their academic affiliation

3. Accuracy of information /credibility– is the information correct or valid? If something doesn’t seem right, check it out. While most printed materials have been vetted (checked for accuracy), some have specific points of view that skew the information (see point of view below). It is especially easy to present invalid information on the Web so be sure to verify information and consider the authority of the author.
4. Audience – who was the intended reader? Was the resource meant for a university student or faculty or written for a grade school? Was the goal to present basic information for a general or a scholarly audience?
5. Point of view or bias –relates to the purpose of the resource and the intended audience.